Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
No, no and no. Breasts exist for solely aesthetic purposes. The size and shape of a woman's breasts have no bearing on the ability to breast feed.
|
We're arguing semantics here. Tits exist to feed baby humans. If we hatched from eggs... we wouldn't necessarily need them and thus they wouldn't exist.
This might be a chicken / egg argument as well. While I agree with the logic that shapely breasts instead of gorilla tits are devices of mate attraction... did they evolve that way to market the female or did we decide we like it and it evolved it from selection?