Quote:
|
Originally Posted by filtherton
But then again, again, they lived in a time of muskets (i think), and i imagine few, if any, of them had any accurate notions as to the scope and effectiveness of the weaponry that would eventually be available to fit in the palm of one's hand.
|
Curiously, you don't often find exceptions for muzzle loading pistols in gun control bills.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by filtherton
They were men of their times, and the constitution reflects that. We are a reflection of our times, where it's been at least a half a century since any american had to fight in a war whose outcome might be directly and obviously linked with our continued existence as a country. It's been even longer since we've had to fight for our existence on our own soil (9/11 doesn't count). Nowadays, tyranny is expected from the government. I think the founding fathers failed to take into account that things earned are often more respected than things given. I imagine that if they were more astute observers of human behavior, or were aware of the inevitable invention of the television, they might not have even bothered.
|
Are you under the impression than every single able bodied male in the colonies picked up his trusty musket and kilt him some redcoats? It is expected that a revolution will start with a small number of people and, given sufficient popular support, will be able to fight and take the day. But the population must be able to give support that is
relevant to the cause... and for that reason we have limited the power we grant to our government to restrict what support the population can offer to would-be revolutionaries.