View Single Post
Old 11-11-2007, 09:17 PM   #24 (permalink)
filtherton
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
So does this mean I could start a new brand of atheism which worships Jesus as the son of God and still have it be branded as a true form of as atheism? I'm just wondering because it appears to me this is what you're saying.
No. Regardless of what i'm saying, the definition of atheism still implies a lack of a belief in a diety. The term christianity implies a belief in and following of jesus. That's it, despite what your pastor told you. It doens't mean you have to hate homosexuals, it doesn't mean that interracial marriages are an abomination, it just means that you place a high priority on the worship of the jesus. You can pretend that you're following the only "true" form of christianity, but you'd be full of shit in doing so.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ubertuber
Filtherton: can it really be completely relative?

I ask because I have recently heard claims and rejections of the idea that Mormonism is a flavor of Christianity. To me, that seems to be stretching things a bit - I mean, at some point a group could claim to fall under the umbrella, but a reasonable analysis would disagree.
It's completely relative. There are many folks who call themselves christian who would no doubt disagree, but they really have no basis for their disagreement that isn't completely circular. There is no consensus on the "correct" details concerning proper christian belief and there is no objective definition, hence the many different sects that exist. All the baptists and the ucc folk really have in common is that they both believe in christ, but claiming that only one is "truly"
christian isn't really all that compelling because any such claim would necessarily be based on matters of opinion.

Certainly most christians don't think that their christianity isn't the true one, but that should be pretty obvious; why would they? But, if pat robertson can be a good christian, being the greedy, bigoted anti-jesus that he was, well, that doesn't really point of any sort of meaningful definition of christianity, beyond the fact that he professed a belief in and a following of jesus the son of god.
filtherton is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360