View Single Post
Old 11-10-2007, 02:29 PM   #47 (permalink)
abaya
 
abaya's Avatar
 
Location: Iceland
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crompsin
I'd gladly pay 3x the amount I'm paying for vegetables if it meant that our system was working without paying subminimum wages to illegals.
Alright, well we're cool then. But most people in American probably would not agree.
Quote:
Legality is a totally black or white area in statutory law. Enforcement of said laws, however, is not.

Illegal means a whole lot in the US. Ever dealt with the court system?
Yes, this is a good point of clarification. I have dealt with the court system on occasion--but ONLY when I've been caught. A few speeding tickets here and there, but nothing like what I deserve for my illegal activities behind the wheel.

Perhaps what we should instead be saying is that these are Under-Enforced Illegal Immigrants, to get the point across. Because that IS the point... that America does its piddly best to "enforce" these immigration laws, but certainly not what is in our full capability to do, because it's not in our best economic and political interests to "enforce" these things. Here it is again:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slate
If we thought illegal immigration was really a bad thing—if, say, the problem were the unlawful arrival not of workers, but of disease-bearing chickens—the government might rapidly deploy the most effective form of enforcement, with the support of all parts of society.
If we REALLY, REALLY cared that these people were breaking our laws (and by "we," I mean big business and politicians, the ones who actually have the power to do something here), they could do it. They could take severe action. But they aren't doing it. They don't particularly care if the immigrants are illegal, as long as they are doing what they're supposed to be doing: giving the US cheap labor. Continuing again...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slate
But instead the nation tolerates illegal immigration to create a de facto guest-worker program. Immigration is what economists call "trade in services," and effective enforcement would make most services more expensive, just as blockading China would make many goods more expensive. It can be tough on low-wage workers, but the United States is richer overall because we get cheaper labor, while Mexicans and other workers are richer for selling it.
Can you argue with this? Where is this analysis wrong?
__________________
And think not you can direct the course of Love;
for Love, if it finds you worthy, directs your course.

--Khalil Gibran
abaya is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360