Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
Talk about contradiction... If they say it contradicts the constitution, it does. That's the interpretation. Jesus.
|
there is only a contradiction when someone thinks that 'interpret' is defined as 'what did the lawmakers or founder REALLY mean when they wrote that.' Otherwise, it's reading the plain wording of the law and applying it to that end.
Again, why is it so damn hard to read what was written, the plain word, and NOT have to 'interpret' what the hell the words 'really' mean?
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him."
|