Excuse me the melodramatic title that is just a tease. I didn’t want to create a new thread as I just wanted to explain me and excuse my lack of response to Willravel and anyone else that may have been interested in the discussion. I asked to include a couple of lines expressing that in the other thread (last “Reason is Overvalued…” thread), but I have only received silence as answer (and is me who is depicted as impolite).
It looks like our never well appreciated moderators didn’t see (sigh) “anything to discuss” in my posts so they insist in sanctioning that ominous asseveration by shutting down any incipient discussion. I have to recognize that their logic is as rounded and rotund as Pope’s infallibility. No point then in posting an answer to WIllravel or anyone here as we will not be able to continue the discussion as this thread will be eventually closed because
roundedly it will not contains anything to discuss (they are fervent followers of San Anselmo arguments too).
Also I am indicted of “veiled insulting”, a felony very popular in the Middle East. Curiously I was the one actually being insulted as you will not find any aggression in my posts. Unless, I suppose, they have very dirty minds and they are imaging such things in the censored parts. Now seriously (not really) I don’t find offensive to delineate the inanity of other’s arguments, but on the contrary quite proper to a discussion and also utterly entertaining. Unnecessary tiptoeing and empty mutual flattering just dilutes the conversation into pure ego massaging. I much prefer roughness and biting to the point, at least in (but not confined to) argumentative matters. What amazes me is the hypocrisy that censures verbal fierceness but bestows in its crib a section like this:
http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showthread.php?t=116650. That should appear normal for USA populace conditioned to such oxymorons as liberating by bombing but used to obtuse censorship all around like bleeping harmless language (BTW, that’s an endemic “logic” sample quite appropriated for the topic on debate). Bullets are ok but their mind is too fragile for some and such discussions. Actually, words are very dangerous.
Anyhow I just suppose that my irreverence is too much for their holiness the
motherators. I will avoid posting here the private messages to that respect as I don’t want to embarrass too much anybody.
I will conclude with an opinion in the form of a parable. It is about certain
logics and also a kiss good bye. I love you more.
Rational Man wakes up each morning with a fright. After breakfast he smiles, kisses its wife and children and goes to work. He is a free spirit, he makes its own rules, not like that blind people that follow the traditional rules. Anyway, after methodically polishing his boss’ ass he can go home and be really free. Then it smiles to his kin and like any other family man makes love to his wife and daughters, Lisa and Christina, a couple of just beautiful and tender little peachy pussies. He does not fuck his young boy because, although at some point it has crossed his mind and that would be so hip and unconventional, that would appear just too gay for him. Then at night just before going to bed he spits to the sky and his saliva collects little by little under his window, solidifying and building up a big shining white tower of pretexts. His wife thinks that it gives luster to their backyard. He does not know but tomorrow he will be dead. However the tower will continue growing and someone will still be fucking his wife and daughters and, since progress never stops, maybe his boy too.
I know that you are not Rational Man, but you are not different from him.
---
If someone is interested about the discussion I will hang around in the
other philosophy forums.
Now you can proceed to close, gag, blind, fuck or carefully cuddle this thread.
Enjoy.