Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ergo
Reason and logic are preached with great regard from the multimedia pulpits of today’s world. Almost everyone believe to follow their high paths. But if, as it is logically evident, logic cannot be based on itself, which are the dirty and extraneous forces that you follow when you are supposedly being logical. if logic cannot support itself how it is being reasonable even logical? What is actually driving behind that assumed logic? Will you address the intimate questioning? Will you dare to explore the obscure passages that lay not below or above but that in reality are the fucking sperm of that logical and unreal world?
|
You had me till sperm. Okay, so If I'm reading the above correctly, one assumes that preached, or suposed (read: not necessarily sound) logic is preached from people who do not support their logic. Makes sense. A lot of people have problems disassociating from preconceived frameworks and assumptions, and thus their logic is tainted. Still, the sperm thing is not only a bit obscure, but unnecessarily graphic. Moving on...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ergo
You will not; I answer with no reason whatsoever. The quid is to identify who I refer with you, they thou or me? You don’t need an identity crisis but ears that can hear the uproar within the silences.
|
So you're not going to respond reasonably in this thread after the OP? I realize you're trying to illustrate something, but you're shooting yourself in the foot by serving it up to us in this manner.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ergo
It is beyond any logic that humans prefer to deceit themselves.
|
Wrong. Deceiving one's self can be totally logical in many instances, and as such a sweeping statement gives you a weak leg to stand on. Want me to share such instances? You'll have to reply back in a logical manner.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ergo
You believe that you reasonably reached that conclusion. But you don’t, [Censored]. Logic is a consistent absurd. You say that A necessarily implies B, but oh my dear liar, you wanted to go to B from the beginning so you just use that mercenary whore of logic to get you there. The problem is that you feed from your own lies, and when you later want to go C you don’t go because you need to believe in your “system”, you need to keep that B is the logical conclusion. What an absurd. What a fake scaffolding logic is. Will you learn to support yourself on the void? You [Censored].
|
What an absurd, indeed. Logic, is simply inference based on precedence and understanding of natural systems. Yes, a drawback is that we've not all had the same precedence and have not all learned the same systems. And yes, many can color their findings with a favored result. So we should give up on logic altogether just because sometimes we fail at it? Maybe you'd like anarchy because democracy doesn't always work, too.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ergo
Just look around who lead the people in the world, just some examples: Bush, Bin Laden, Paris Hilton. Neither known for their sophisticate reasoning, and still their followers think that what they believe is perfectly logical. Take a look, “war on terror” (quite an absurdity in its own terms), “the holy killing of the infidels” (no need to elaborate its ludicrousness), “sucking penises” (this one at least makes some sense). Those are the things that direct us, that move the world, not your pity logic.
|
Within their twisted perception of the world, some do find that sentiments like killing or being bigoted ar logical. Again, that doesn't mean we need to do away with it. That means we need to refine it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ergo
So, ladies and gentleman, gracious and gallant members of this forum, esteem forum Motherators whose arduous labor taking care of us destitute children is never well appreciated and whose wisdom is unquestionable in such an absolute and rotund way, I address you in the most courteous and careful way, taking good care that my words don’t represent any challenge or defiance to your delicate minds, will the good lord preserve them, I address you as I was saying to discuss and ponder the different opinions that can be uphold about the aforesaid subject, and to ask the outstanding questions. I hope that my questioning and opinions will not make you feel uncomfortable or forcefully confronted; so help me God. You [Censored].
|
Condescension is a function of compensation. I've never been condescended to by anyone who was better than I, anyway.