View Single Post
Old 11-02-2007, 12:19 PM   #43 (permalink)
xxxafterglow
Crazy
 
xxxafterglow's Avatar
 
Location: Berlin
Quote:
Originally Posted by flstf
It seems like a good idea to hold the evil restaurant corporations responsible but what about the little mom and pop restaurants and bars, etc..? Do we really want to blame wedding party organizers, etc.. for those who over do it?

I recently attended my class reunion where there was an open self serve bar and self serve coolers at the picnic the next day. Many of us drank too much (my wife was driving). Should we hold the two gals who volunteered their time to organize the event responsible when someone drinks too much and drives?

We should not expect the servers, bartenders, etc..to know who is driving and who has consumed more than they can hold. The blame should be put right where it belongs, on those who decide to get drunk and drive.
Why do you think bouncers and exist at corporate AND independently-owned restaurants? If you facilitated the drink, you assisted in the accident.

There's a reason this is examined on a case-by-case basis. In some instances, the waitress/bartender/staff can clearly see that the customer is a potential danger to him/herself and/or others. A lot of staff (in both corporate and independently-owned places) are told to cut people off once they've had too much.

Hey man, we're just asking for a little accountability.

EDIT: By the way, I'm not advocating absolving the drunk driver of responsibility. Drunk driver = driver + drink. The college-aged waitress isn't making the grown-up decisions for the person, she's making an intelligent decision to cut him off when he becomes a potential hazard. If she keeps bringing him drinks to the point of him having trouble walking straight as he fumbles for his car keys ... well, it doesn't take a college student to figure out that he probably shouldn't be driving.
It's not unheard of for staff to call a cab or a friend. It's part of good customer service. We try to aim for a low death rate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FoolThemAll
We might as well sentence the drunk driver as a juvenile, since the staff at Outback are required to make all the grownup decisions for him.

Yes, it's a known intoxicant. That's the point. The customer knows the risks. It's on him, entirely. We should not be treating the minimum-wage college student waitress as though she's his mommy.

Unfortunately, when some people get drunk, they are incapable of making intelligent grownup decisions.

The sober college-aged staff, however, are.
__________________
Uh huh her.

Last edited by xxxafterglow; 11-02-2007 at 12:36 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
xxxafterglow is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360