Your post begs the question of how the top 10% accumulated 70% of the "wealth" in this nation?
I would argue that the majority of those top 10% started poor or middle class.
I would further argue that the top 10% is dynamic, meaning the top 10% today are not the same top 10% ten years ago.
And since about 35% of the population is 24 years-old or less (generally people in this category have no assets, in case you did not know and are one of the few with a big trust fund), seems to me that you might want to do some adjusting to that 50% of the population only having 2.5% of the assets number.