Quote:
|
Originally Posted by willravel
If when you say "everything" you're not only referring to what is but also fiction and what isn't, then yes I agree that science cannot explain everything. If, however, you mean everything as in that which is in the universe that is real and not fictitious, then I disagree. I needed clarification before presenting a rebuttal.
|
When i say everything i mean everything that actually is.
Quote:
|
My understanding of the uncertainty principle not a sense, it's an observation based on tons of precedence. I'm also not aware of a general consensus on Heisenberg, either. As I understand it, many physicists agree that it's something we cannot solve today, but that hardly means it's something we can't solve tomorrow.
|
All natural laws, like the second law of thermodynamics, or newton's law of gravitation, are merely observations based on tons of precedence. You're right that science has definitely proven itself wrong before. Despite that being the case, you aren't being a very good steward of science by claiming that it is okay to deny the validity of well supported theories because you don't agree with their implications. That's the kind of thing intelligent design proponents do.