Kadath,
Where to begin is very simple. Like all other amendments, the Courts end up what is deciding what are reasonable restrictions on them.
An example of this is restrictions of "freedom of speech" (e.g. you cannot yell "fire" in a crowded theater).
I think it is perfectly reasonable to restrict anything that is a "crew serviced" weapon and above.
That being said, when I posted this exact same question on a gun board last year, many felt that they SHOULD be allowed to own anything they could afford, including rockets, and fully functioning fighter aircraft and tanks (with the possible exception of atomic weapons).
My thought was and still is, that IF a revolution is needed, guns will liberate those heavier weapons from the national guard armories where most are kept.
__________________
"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience." – C. S. Lewis
The ONLY sponsors we have are YOU!
Please Donate!
Last edited by Lebell; 06-02-2003 at 07:35 PM..
|