Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tecoyah
I was thinking (yeah...I know, bad Idea), but for me at least the lack of serious debate comes down to two things:
1) the vast majority of people agree for the most part with my stance, thus making debate pointless.
2) those who do not agree have debated with me on the issues, and are extremely negative for the most part, making debate again...pointless.
|
Perhaps there is yet another reason.
A search of posts containing the word "Abramoff":
Showing results 1 to 40 of 91
A search of posts by Host containing the word "Abramoff":
Showing results 1 to 40 of 58
In these posts, Host was able to delve out incredibly minute details of public figures he dislikes. Contrast that to a search for posts by Host containing the word "Hsu":
Showing results 1 to 3 of 3
Unfortunately, none of these refer to NORMAN Hsu.
A man who can tell you Abramoff's uncle's shoe size, and who posts at length of real and imagined transgressions by Republican politicians, does not stimulate me to debate if he has not heard of Norman Hsu. For that matter, a large majority of other posters on this forum has no interest in lawbreakers who are not named Abramoff, Cheney, Rove, or Bush.
Why in the world would anyone consider debating people with such closed mindsets? Perhaps one of Host's lengthy posts, this time dishing on Norman Hsu, would stimulate animated debate.