View Single Post
Old 10-17-2007, 03:55 PM   #16 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapiens
I'm aware of what a double-blind test is - both experimenters and participants are unaware of the experimental group the participant is in. I'm just curious to know how it would be done using the correlational methods used in intelligence research. If you are studying IQ, typically you are collecting data on a variety of demographic variables up front, including race. IQ tests are typically administered using paper and pencil forms. 1) How will you blind the paper form to race? 2) How will you blind the participant to their own race?
I remember standardized testing in schools. They asked my ethnicity, but never (until like a minute ago) did I think they may be using that to qualify my race's intellect. If it's just one of many black dots, I'd guess that only a few people may guess what it is.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapiens
I'm not sure what you mean. If people have similar backgrounds, how can you test cultural influences? If you mean that they all need to come from similar socioeconomic status, they do not. Differences in IQ due to SES (or any other variable) can be controlled statistically as long as you have a sufficient sample size. I do agree that more studies showing the same results increases confidence in the validity of the results.
Make it a part of a questionnaire to throw them off the trail.

Yes, a bigger sample and more tests would be best before conclusions were drawn.
Quote:
Originally Posted by sapiens
The standard IQ test (probably the WAIS) is probably the most valid test of intelligence that exists.
I like it (probably because i do well on it).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
Ah... Ha... I laughed when I read this.

At the risk of sounding like a racist, it's usually whites (People of European decent) who could, in general, be classified as 'less inteligent'. The only reason I say this is because, historically, Europe has typically lagged behind other non-European cultures in terms of advances in math, science, medicine, engineering etc. Screw what IQ tests. I'd rather look at history.
The guns/germs/steel advantage translated to quicker advancing science, math, medicine, and engineering in Europe. Read Diamond's "Guns, Germs, and Steel".

Last edited by Willravel; 10-17-2007 at 03:57 PM.. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360