View Single Post
Old 10-16-2007, 08:30 AM   #6 (permalink)
dc_dux
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
to be hard as diamond, the costs would be way more than suggested, which really means that the price of any handguns sold in cali are going to skyrocket. This is the true intent of the law, not to aid in crime solving, but to make it too expensive for california residents to buy new handguns. sales based gun ban.
The Police Officers Association of California puts the cost at a dollar or two. The director of forensics at U Cal-Davis put the cost the $8 the first year and $2 in subsequent years. He also said the technology may not be ready for prime time - but they have two years to improve it before it is implemented.
http://www.gilroydispatch.com/news/c...w.asp?c=225172

Quote:
Originally Posted by dksuddeth
Again, there are way too many 'workarounds' to defeat this technology. It is ludicrous to suggest that 'common thugs' are too stupid to defeat this microstamping and then to turn around and say these same thugs are smarter than the average citizen so it doesn't pay to resist/fight back, etc.
It has the support of upper law enforcement because it effectively will prevent citizens from obtaining new handguns. Notice that this law exempts LEO's, meaning they can buy guns that don't require microstamping. why are they exempt from the same laws as us?
Is it correct that if somehow the common thug has the tools to file it off that the firing pin will no longer work? If so, either it cant be filed off because it is too hard or it can and the firing pin will no longer work -- win win

Law enforcement wants to prevent and solve crimes, not take your guns away, but I know you will never be convince you of that.

Quote:
it is NOT a crime fighting tool anymore than the gun database is. This is just another regulatory scheme to ban guns. This law currently does not affect cali handguns that are already on the 'safe' roster. What will happen then is that this will be called a loophole and there will be callse to amend the law to close the 'loophole'. This is a gun ban, pure and simple.
There was no discussion of grandfathering the legislation to include existing handguns at any time during the legislative hearings....so you really have nothing to substantiate your oft-suggested claims of plots to ban guns.

Will it help in solving crimes? Too soon to tell but if the technology meets its promise, it will.

Will it hurt law abiding citizens? I dont see how, other than adding a very small % increase to the cost of handguns after Jan 1, 2010.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 10-16-2007 at 09:17 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360