Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
Here is an inconvenient truth for those who like to rely on sites like JunkScience.com or Fox News (and PrisonPlanet.com) or videos like the Great Global Warming Swindle for their global warming information.
These sites provide "remarks" by skeptical scientists but rarely, if ever (I cant find any) provide links to studies published in credible scientific journals or, at the very least, are peer reviewed.
Why do you think that is? Perhaps because they arent published in credible scientific journals or peer reviewed?
Just a thought.
|
Neither is your link a 'credible scientific journal'. Uh, Fox News? For that matter, ALL news is biased...which would make ALL news non-credible sources.
To reiterate what was said earlier, you pick and choose and edit what you want to convey-everyone does. But to say that your argument is backed by a more 'credible' source, when, in fact it is more biased than something from a 'news source' is just hypocracy and weak.
For what it's worth, I'm 'green' in thought and in deed; it is something I feel pretty strongly about.
But that fact remains that the scientific community is not unanimous in its conclusions about the definitive whats and whys of changing climate, except to say some part may be manmade, some is not.