Quote:
Originally Posted by ngdawg
For every scientist that claims humans are destroying the climate, another will claim bullshit.
|
Sorry, but thats just not true. The vast majority of studies that recognize the anthroprogenic contributions to the greenhouse gases and global warming, particularly the consensus findings of hundreds of scientists that contributed to the IPCC reports, are peer reviewed.
Why is is that most global warming skeptic findings, including Dr. Gray's, are not peer reviewed or published in credible scientific journals?
Why do you think it is that the
science academies of the largest industrial nations dont accept your premise that "for every scientist that claims humans are destroying the climate, another will claim bullshit"? Do you think these national acadamies of science have a pre-determined, political agenda?
Quote:
In the past 30 years, rivers once considered dead have been brought back, natural animal sanctuaries have sprouted across the country, old growth forest destruction has ebbed and industry as a whole has cleaned up its act, literally.
|
Why do you think that happened?
I would attribute it, in large part, to governmental action like the Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, Wilderness Protection Act.