Originally Posted by host

ngdawg....I don't "feel" that Gore is not an appropriate choice for the peace prize....I am convinced that it is an reasonable award for Gore, because of the circumstances of his nomination for the prize, and by the impressive sentiment in support of his nomination:

....and now...again....about your Carter comments....if your opinion of Carter is a feelings based conclusion....kindly say so....if not....where on earth is the support for your argument that Carter "had no business being president"? Why won't you post it? You make it impossible for me to consider the validity of your opinion....and I've attempted to lead you to what I've read that influences my opposite argument....I suspect that you haven't even clicked the links to my old posts and read the articles that document Reagan's deliberate efforts to reverse Carter's prescient and promising leadership in planning, legislating, and executing his plan for US energy independence.... it is so irritating to read post after post containing short, sweeping statements that contradict my research, and the historical record....posts brimming with a confidence that seems obnoxious and taunting, given that they are not supported....

....Did Carter assess the greatest challenges that America would face after his presidency, and design and implement a comprehensive plan to meet those challenges....or....didn't he? I have shared everything that I've dug up about Carter's vision and accomplishments, and what was later done to thwart them and to discredit him.....and you've complained that I've shared too much...and you've offered nothing in response.... I'm tired of that kind of crappy dynamic.....here.....