Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
I'm taking umbrage to one spot here....
Where are there personal attacks? Because they aren't allowed...
Disagreeing and refuting positions are not personal attacks. That's all that I see in this thread.
|
I'm sure you wont see these as personal attacks, although I do....
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SecretMethod70
Sorry, but you've just proven you know very little about some of the basics of science. The first is just plain wrong, and the second shows a severe misunderstanding of the scientific method and, specifically, what a scientific theory is. Just as one can't reasonably choose not to believe in the theory of gravity, it is equally unreasonable not to believe in the theory of evolution. In both cases, not believing in it (regardless of what you think when it comes to the working details) is simply wrong, plain and simple.
|
When an admin states that anyone who doesn't believe in a "theory" is "wrong, plain & simple", and that Pan has a severe misunderstanding of scientific method is making a very personal attack. But it gets better.......
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by SecretMethod70
Congratulations. Though, I have to wonder how you scored that high when you apparently don't know the most basic workings of an atom that are taught in elementary school science. Either the test had more to do with procedures than science, or I'm genuinely concerned for the state of our nuclear program.
|
Another personal attack....IMO. This post alludes that Pans knowledge of science is less than that of an elementary school student.....thats personal.
I don't think I'll continue to dig up all the personal attacks in this thread. That would take all day & fill up pages. I already know what will be said about this anyway.......