Quote:
|
Again, scientists of past believed the world was flat and that stars revolved around the earth. Planets had epicycles that explained how they moved across the skys. There was scientific evidence that proved what they stated. Even Aristole's idea of parallax showed "common sense" applied to the current scientific body of evidence.
|
I see, so you can be wrong if you are unaware of modern science. Nice point. Maybe you should take it to heart.
If you think there’s some detail that needs correcting in the current consensus, then write a paper defending your position, and get it published. You don’t have to be a practicing scientist to do that, but you do have to be informed and be able to think critically.
You of course can’t do it, so instead you compare modern scientists to people who thought the earth was flat. It is rather comically ironic, you know.
Quote:
|
I did NOT state that El Nino was responsible for global warming, I cited it to state that there are small trends withing the cycles. Trends that people did not understand nor get for many decades and still don't really understand just what it means within the larger scope of things. They think they understand it. El Nino is not just about sea currents, the sea temperature CHANGES and increases thus fish in the souther part of Baja California and Mexico are suddenly found much more north than their normal habitat.
|
And none of those “small trends” contributes to global warming. The ocean warms in one place, cools in another, and the net effect is zero. You can’t create heat by moving it from one place to another. If that’s the basis of your argument, then you have no idea what you’re talking about.