Quote:
|
I don't feel the need to bring up a line of scientific evidence. I can just point to climatic cycles of previous ice ages and retreats. They happened WITHOUT the affect of human beings and industrialization.
|
…. therefore, what?
“I can just point to the fact that people can get cancer naturally. It happens WITHOUT swallowing uranium”
“I can just point to the fact that people die all the time. It happens WITHOUT getting decapitated”
Why is it necessary to point out that (1) just because something occurred in nature once doesn't mean it can't possibly be dangerous to people; and (2) just because something can increase or decrease naturally doesn’t mean it can’t be increased 10x as fast by people?
Quote:
|
I cite that as my "critical thinking" point.
|
Why have you been you keeping it under your hat? You could have passed it on to climate scientists and saved the U.S. multimillions in pointless global warming research.
Quote:
|
At one point the greatest minds of science thought the world was flat and that the heavens revolved around the earth. There was a consensus back then, they had evidence that proved their points.
|
Well I guess we can ignore the entire corpus of modern science then. I wonder what we will replace it with? Rush’s dittohead consensus, perhaps?