As has been said, vigilantism is against the law. The shop was wrong for breaking the law, and the vet was wrong for breaking the law. Both parties are at fault.
That said, I don't really have strong feelings about either side of this. The law in question is a bit nationalist, so I don't really personally care if it was done except that you don't just break a law you disagree with. You change the law. Likewise, I don't really care that this vet decided that this inoffensive thing was so amazingly horrible that he couldn't press 3 numbers on a phone. It wasn't a Vietnamese flag made out of human skin. It was jut a Mexican flag, the flag of our friendly neighbors. He acted like an idiot.
BTW, why would it matter if he was a vet? Does the flag somehow mean more to him because of that fact? Or was it just sensationalism?
Also, TFPers are generally a lot smarter than Diggers.
|