The article posted by Cynthetiq (one of the two links that Ustwo described as excellent),
"Survey: Less Than Half of all Published Scientists Endorse Global Warming Theory" by Klaus Martin Schulte, was rejected by the journal
Energy and Environment. (
link)
Schulte's article drew heavily from an earlier study by Benny Peiser, who self-published his paper on his own website after
Science magazine had rejected it....after his work was criticized by a number of climate scientists, who said most of those 34 papers did not actually reject the IPCC consensus, Peiser later retracted his critique, saying only one of the 34 papers had actually rejected the IPCC position. (
link)
No consensus? There is consensus among the Academies of Science of the largest industrial nations in the world that "is it likely that most of the warming in recent decades can be attributed to human activity." (
link)
Where's the beef in the "no consensus" position?