Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ubertuber
Your point about original data interpretation might be a good one, but I confess to being skeptical that you sit around reading the raw data for these studies.
More than that, I'm stunned that in the last 4.5 years you haven't figured out the difference between discussing issues and discussing people. It's really not that difficult.
What possible gain do you get from trying to diminish Will's status in this argument? If you're going to take down scientists who believe in global warming one at a time in this fashion, you'll be stuck here for a while.
|
If some 'real' global warming scientist was posting here and they described themselves as far left and couldn't even figure out how a plane hit the pentagon while belittling and ignoring any evidence against human caused global warming you bet your ass I'd go from this angle. We don't post in a vacuum here. Its not attacking Will personally by pointing out own deep bias in looking at data as demonstrated by the 9/11 threads. You yourself were the mod who let that stuff get on tfp politics if I recall when in the past it was kept nicely locked up in paranoia.
The fact that global warming goes into politics itself speaks volumes for the real issue here.