Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
There is nothing new here, other than a veiled attempt (IMO) of the OP to minimize the impact of industrial (not just transportation) component of human activities that contribute to global warming.
The widespread consensus is that the anthropogenic impact on global warming results from both industrial and agricultural activities and that solutions should address both.
|
I agree, but one thing that is important is that in our quest to address both we don't neglect both. An idea that would affect one of them and not the other is not necessarily a bad idea and i'd say go forward with said idea and then work on solving the other side.
Reducing our emissions won't come in one swift swipe but instead in many small swipes.
This is what happend to the Kyoto to many people were saying it doesn't solve the problem completely so it shouldn't be ratified..... so instead of doing something we are doing nothing. Hardly a good solution.