|
You are correct about time, place, and manner restrictions, but I don't think it's really an applicable concept here. Why not? Because no one is going to tell you what GP did was 100% legal in the first place. The situations aren't really analogous here. There's no question that the speech IS restricted in this case. But the question is can you stretch conduct/speech into a felony offense (I suggest the answer is no in this matter).
I don't buy the sanctity of property argument. Private property hasn't been sacred in the US for ages: we've got an estate tax, several liens that can rip your house from under you (including action by your friendly homeowner's association), there's condemnation, and the government can enter your home without your permission (no knock exception, firefighters). And there's no real argument that a corporation's property is the same thing as an individual's property. Whereas you can picket all you want in front of a company's headquarters, you cannot picket in front of a person's private residence. (You can parade through her neighborhood here.) This whole "straw that broke the camel's back" or "sliding uphill on the slippery slope" argument doesn't really hold water. While a corp may be a citizen for some purposes, there are many times when the private citizen is entitled to more rights.
|