Then where did you get the idea that unequivocal means 90%? I don't see it anywhere in my copy. What did you mean by "our new science" when you said "So, in our new science 90% becomes 'unequivocal'?" Can you quote me the relevant passage in your version of the report you read?
Quote:
|
All questions have not been answered.
|
I was referring to your questions about Dr. James Hansen. I repeat: all your questions about him he has answered himself in his own publications, in great scientific detail. Have you read any of them?
Quote:
|
One question that has not been answered is, given the interplay between the variables affecting our climate what is the determining factor that will make one variable so dominate that off-setting variables won't compensate?
|
What compensating variables? Reference? Who told you this?
If you are seriously interested in learning about the predominance of positive feedbacks, you could start by reading Dr. Hansen's most recent publication, which you can access here:
http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/c...462k7p4068780/