Quote:
Originally Posted by QuasiMondo
Radical Honesty must be for entertainment value, like doing your best imitation of Simon Colwell or chef Gordon Ramsay. It has to be, there's just no other way I can justify using it. I went back and read the article again.
Why add the shock value? Wasn't he honest enough the first time around? Obviously, it's not enough to be honest when it comes to Radical Honesty. You have to leave people with their jaws hanging open from what you've just said. This is supposed to be refreshing? I think not.
|
Agreed. If he was being honest, it would have come out the first time.
There's also a little bit of dishonesty in emulating the author's shock and awe style. I'm honest in my own way without being disrespectful and using language that is if ill repute.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
|