LOL....another "objective" IBD editorial, but not as good as the one called
"Apocalypse Cow" which downplays the human impact, misrepresents a UN study and blames cow flatulence.
But even given the fact (?) that Hansen may have received $750,000 from Soros for "media packaging" (whatever that means), the research in question is NASA research.....which one could reasonably believe is more objective than the multitude of global warming debunking studies, with $millions of funding from Exxon-Mobile Foundation, the American Petroleum Institute, the George T Marshall Institute, et al.
More "grist for the mill: Look at the funding of
five prominent global warming skeptics
And lets not forget the political contributions of big oil, mostly to support members of Congress who are global warming skeptics, opposed to funding alternative energy r&d, and are "big oil friendly" on related energy/environment issues....amounting to over
$100 million in the last four election cycles.