Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
Which assumption are you talking about? You have me confused because it seems like you are responding to issues I am not bringing up.
Here is a link to some if not all of Hansen's published research going back to 1966. If his work was used to drawn incorrect conclusions, I would think he would have a problem with that. In the 80's he seems to start to take a more direct approach to discussing climate change.
http://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/authors/jhansen.html
Sometimes I surprise some people on what I understand. Often my questions are intended to cut to the core of an issue. |
Then I am confused I think. From what I have read I get the issue you are bringing up as inconsistencies in the Ideas put forward by Mr Hansen. I have spent the better part of this page trying to explain that he did not put the Ice Age Idea on tha table, as I believed you expressed he had. If this is not the case, then it seems you are simply stating that by virtue of his research being used by another scientist to create a hypothesis, he must then also believe in said hypothesis. Is that correct?
Might it also be possible (though I certainly dont know), that the clarity you note in the 80's was due to the very use of his research you have taken issue with? And if so, I think that might very well be his answer to the question you raise, and likely the only one you will get. Its not likely the man will try to explain why he changed his mind....if he didn't.