Frosstbyte

He's putting forth the idea that they used a legal term of art which is best argued by attorneys for both parties and decided by a judge and jury, as opposed to laymen throwing around other ideas. You would probably be SHOCKED at how different some legal definitions are compared to their lay definitions. And a lot of us in this thread feel like we could make a strong argument for why these sort of actions would fall within a LEGAL definition of "private ends" even if it doesn't fit into the coffee shop definition.