Quote:
|
Originally Posted by aceventura3
If I develop a formula for calculating the force of gravity. A rocket scientist should be able to use it to determine how much thrust is need to send a rocket into orbit. If the rocket fails to reach orbit, it is possible that the rocket scientist is wrong in some of his work and it is possible that my formula is wrong. Isn't it appropriate to revisit the issue and look at all the components that went into the failure?
|
Actually "Real" science is far more complicated than that, which is why specializatioon becomes required. The models we are talking about use far too many parts to be deeply understood by any one scientist. It may very well be the hypothesis was focused on limited Data to get a more detailed result on a subject....leaving out other possible outcomes. More likely the input was varied continuously to mimick climate changes and the mean variants measured for the results. I think you might not fully understand what a climate model truly is....Hell I dont, and I have studied them.