The messy part comes later in the sentence where it says "for private ends" which would create a question of whether or not their action was for public ends (their argument) or private ends (the shipping company's argument). I think it'd cut towards the shipping company, personally, but that's obvious.
Edit: I'm sure I'm right about what I wrote in that sentence and would be happy to flood this thread with legal authority for it, if you want it. You keep talking about profits and we're talking about operating costs wasted because of third party actions. You either don't understand what we're writing or your blindly ignoring it. But if you're so sure, go build a wall in front of the doors to a store and see what happens.
Last edited by Frosstbyte; 09-13-2007 at 01:24 PM..
|