Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
ace....give me a break!
The combined analysis and resulting conclusions of the hundreds of intel experts, while never 100% certain, has far greater credibility than you, a layperson with an agenda.
|
In terms of credibility you may be correct, after all I am anonymous to TFP'ers. But this is the same NIE that said Iraq had development programs for WMD as well as chemical and biological weapons. I thought you were among those who felt Bush lied based on his use of NIE analysis.
What does "give me a break!" mean? Are you saying I am wrong to call speculation what it is? Are you saying I should accept NIE information without question? Are you suggesting that I not speculate and others can? What's up with that, I don't get it?