look, folks, if you read my posts above you'll find that i said pretty clearly where the line is for me between what i would report and what i would not.
the relevant sentences are those that begin with community norms being violated. i said i would report a burglary or other violations, particularly of persons. i indicated that i might be ambivalent about it as well. so i made another post that explained why i might be ambivalent.
here's a summary of that one:
i was burglarized in philadelphia and i lost a computer and backup that cost me two fucking years worth of work.
two fucking years. a nearly complete book. something that could have had a significant impact on my professional life. something i devoted an ENORMOUS amount of time and effort to doing (this last bit i didnt put in).
gone.
gone because i went to dinner at the wrong time.
furthermore i said that the cops, which i called, did nothing.
fuck all.
and THAT explains the ambivalence.
[[btw: i dont talk about this much. apparently i still get angry about it.]]
the other side of the line--and i made this quite clear as well if you read the post----is the police in their explicitly political functions. in that area, i would never turn in anyone to the cops.
now within this, there are obviously separations that i would make, but i didnt talk about them.
so if you want to debate with me, try again.
__________________
a gramophone its corrugated trumpet silver handle
spinning dog. such faithfulness it hear
it make you sick.
-kamau brathwaite
Last edited by roachboy; 08-28-2007 at 07:28 PM..
|