|
I understand the point of seizing the money, but I am thinking it's a bit ridiculous. If he had drugs on him, a history of selling drugs, etc then it may be more understandable. I don't know how one would be able to prove that the money belongs to them. I can see how if I were in that situation I wouldn't be able to prove it. Some people don't like keeping their money in banks etc, and I've always been a secret fan of money in the mattress. I dunno, I think unless he has reason to be suspect of possessing drug money, he should have his money back.
__________________
I like things. And stuff. But I prefer to have things over stuff.
|