Quote:
Originally Posted by Infinite_Loser
So you're saying that he should have voted "Yes" simply because the bill was going to pass anyway? I don't understand this train of thought one bit.
|
If you read my posts, nowhere did I suggest he should vote for a bill because it would pass anyway.
I said his supporters shouldnt complain about election problems when he voted against a bill like HAVA that addressed those problems (by requiring paper trails, voting machine testing and certification, provisional voting.
I think anyone seriously considering RP should be asking him to explain some of his NO votes beyond what is often his false premise of constitutionality (ie what is unconstitutional about HAVA and Voting Rights Act?)