|
Interesting idea for a thread Jinnkai.
Since I hang out in Politics a lot, I've become accustomed to seeing posts where someone will identify a logical fallacy in an opponent's post and move on as if the label resolved the whole thing. I never quite understood that. Just because something is observed or phrased as an identifiable fallacy doesn't make the point entirely specious.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam
|