View Single Post
Old 08-17-2007, 08:20 AM   #24 (permalink)
dc_dux
 
dc_dux's Avatar
 
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by aceventura3
I have read many references to the data and the correction. I did not see any bloggers using the corrected data in the manner in which DC's post suggests. Most clearly acknowledge the correction was minor.
ace....your own article does:
NASA has now silently released corrected figures, and the changes are truly astounding...

The effect of the correction on global temperatures is minor (some 1-2% less warming than originally thought), but the effect on the U.S. global warming propaganda machine could be huge.
the changes are truly astounding?`...acknowledging a minor correction as having a HUGE impact on the global truly warming propaganda machine?

Sorry, but to me, that is the anti-global warming propaganda machine at work.
__________________
"The perfect is the enemy of the good."
~ Voltaire

Last edited by dc_dux; 08-17-2007 at 08:31 AM..
dc_dux is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73