Quote:
|
Originally Posted by samcol
It's funny how you admit election irregularities then say it couldn't of effected a candidate in the poll....  |
The Iowa straw poll was hardly a serious election.
Quote:
|
You don't get how bills work do you? Just like in the other thread where you listed all the proposed bills by the democrats as evidence of them 'not doing nothing', the names of the bills almost never do what the title implies.
|
I helped write a few bills. I think I know pretty well how the process works.
Quote:
So now instead of having occational localized voter fraud and problems, now we have nationalized voter fraud through diebold e-voting machines. Candidates no longer have to buy off hundreds of districts, they just have to buy off the centralized Diebold vote counting database. Don't forget last election the head of diebold said he is 'commited to delivering the election to Republicans.
I'm wondering how many congressman Diebold had to buy to get this massive E voting machine contract that is the Help America Vote Act. All this did was waste more money, resources, and wasted what little integrity was left in the voting system.
Sometimes it's nice to have a candidate that can't be bought. Tell me why Ron Paul should of voted for this again?
|
You might try actually reading the bill for once, as well as the many analysis of numerous non-partisan public interest groups before you make bogus claims about HAVA and what its certification standards may mean to Diebold.
I dont suggest any pierce of legislation is perfect....but these two are pretty damn good despite Ron "DR NO" Paul's interpretation.