Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dc_dux
I share your concern with the integrity of the election process, but no one stole from Ron Paul what he never had.
BTW, Paul voted against the bi-partisan Help America Vote Act of 2002 that requires States and localities to meet uniform and nondiscriminatory election technology and administration standards and provides tougher enforcement mechanisms for the Federal Election Commission. It passed in the House by a vote of 357-48. Way to go, Ron....you sure helped clean up the election process.....not. 
He also voted against the reauthorization of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, one of the landmark bills of our lifetime that guarantees that citizens are not disenfranchised. It passed 390-33. |
It's funny how you admit election irregularities then say it couldn't of effected a candidate in the poll....
You don't get how bills work do you? Just like in the other thread where you listed all the proposed bills by the democrats as evidence of them 'not doing nothing', the names of the bills almost never do what the title implies.
So now instead of having occational localized voter fraud and problems, now we have nationalized voter fraud through diebold e-voting machines. Candidates no longer have to buy off hundreds of districts, they just have to buy off the centralized Diebold vote counting database. Don't forget last election the head of diebold said he is 'commited to delivering the election to Republicans.
I'm wondering how many congressman Diebold had to buy to get this massive E voting machine contract that is the Help America Vote Act. All this did was waste more money, resources, and wasted what little integrity was left in the voting system.
Sometimes it's nice to have a candidate that can't be bought. Tell me why Ron Paul should of voted for this again?