Quote:
Originally Posted by willravel
I usually start by reading the "raw data" (actually apt articles).
|
I have read lots of raw data, I have even read the data Host provided.
What I am missing is the connection between the data Host often provides and how it supports his premise or contradicts mine. When I cite data i usually pick the data that is relevant and then I try to show the relevance.
I am not a savant, my ability to comprehend is on a more base level, it seems Host can look at what appears to me to be random pieces of data and connect it all without much effort or thinking there is a need to show the connections. Most people, including me, are not at that level. If Host is like Mozart, I am like Muddy Waters.
