Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post

analog · 08-07-2007, 02:50 AM

My commentary is always well received, because I base it on how "on display" they are. I react more or less, in appropriate proportion to their exposure.

If you're wearing a shirt that's cut down to the navel, you have them on display. Call it flattering, call it "empowering" or femininity... call it what you want- I will call a spade a spade... they're on display. If you're wearing a turtleneck, they are not. I just think about how relatively obvious they are and comment accordingly (if I'm inclined to comment at all).

This is not to say that staring is acceptable. Staring, no matter what you're staring at on a person, is just rude if unwelcome (once the correct rapport is established, I have been known to stare happily for seemingly endless periods of time... the key word here being "unwelcome").

Still, there have been a few times when I have gotten lost in the depths of a woman's cleavage (not while talking to her, not like I'm staring at the chest while she's speaking) and she'd look in my direction to discover I'd zoned out, eyes fixed on chest.

At that point, it's not staring because I'm "ogling and thinking about naughty things and drooling", I'm literally just *caught*... my brain just says "wow" and ceases all but life-sustaining function for a bit. I'm not consciously fixed and smacking my lips and wringing my hands and making noises...

I'm just... entranced.

It's only happened a handful of times that they were so wonderful that I was instantly lost in a pair of breasts, but my normal reaction is apologetic and explanatory. "I'm sorry... I wasn't staring... I went for a glance and I just sorta... checked out for a minute there".

I think that I come off as harmless and well-meaning, in general, helps set them at ease. I'm not saying I am harmless and well-meaning, but I come off that way.

lol

08-07-2007, 02:50 AM	#8 (permalink)
analog Banned	My commentary is always well received, because I base it on how "on display" they are. I react more or less, in appropriate proportion to their exposure. If you're wearing a shirt that's cut down to the navel, you have them on display. Call it flattering, call it "empowering" or femininity... call it what you want- I will call a spade a spade... they're on display. If you're wearing a turtleneck, they are not. I just think about how relatively obvious they are and comment accordingly (if I'm inclined to comment at all). This is not to say that staring is acceptable. Staring, no matter what you're staring at on a person, is just rude if unwelcome (once the correct rapport is established, I have been known to stare happily for seemingly endless periods of time... the key word here being "unwelcome"). Still, there have been a few times when I have gotten lost in the depths of a woman's cleavage (not while talking to her, not like I'm staring at the chest while she's speaking) and she'd look in my direction to discover I'd zoned out, eyes fixed on chest. At that point, it's not staring because I'm "ogling and thinking about naughty things and drooling", I'm literally just caught... my brain just says "wow" and ceases all but life-sustaining function for a bit. I'm not consciously fixed and smacking my lips and wringing my hands and making noises... I'm just... entranced. It's only happened a handful of times that they were so wonderful that I was instantly lost in a pair of breasts, but my normal reaction is apologetic and explanatory. "I'm sorry... I wasn't staring... I went for a glance and I just sorta... checked out for a minute there". I think that I come off as harmless and well-meaning, in general, helps set them at ease. I'm not saying I am harmless and well-meaning, but I come off that way. lol Last edited by analog; 08-07-2007 at 02:53 AM..