View Single Post
Old 08-04-2007, 01:10 PM   #77 (permalink)
Willravel
... a sort of licensed troubleshooter.
 
Willravel's Avatar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by host
will....do you find any conflict in what you and I and occam's razor concluded about this administation? The propose changes to the FISA laws, passed in the senate and waiting for a vote in the house, will either "sunset" in six months, or be delayed for a conference committee to iron out, at some future date, if the house bill is changed in the version that is passed.....

....Just as in september, 2001, and in the anthrax "attacks" that immediately followed....who benefited? Who would benefit if we were to "get hit" again, anytime between now and the November, 2008 elections.

I don't think that the passage of the Bush requested will make us "safer", but I strongly suspect that preventing passage would persuade them to do something that they really, really, don't want to have to do..... but.....the senate and house dems asked for it, sooooo...... we get hit, AGAIN.....



.....they outed Plame, they launched an illegal war, predicate on lies....and we don't want to think about what they would do if the FISA law changes don't pass. I'm not trying to present an apology for the despicable conduct of democrats....I'm trying to be consistent in my thinking, and asking you to consider that you ought to be, too....
You and I both know to what extent the GOP is corrupt and could even be labeled with such an extreme term as evil. They represent lies and death and suffering and greed and even tyranny. George W. Bush isn't just a massive idiot and tool, but actively represents all that is wrong with the US. We know.

Consistency doesn't mean that you have to support who you supported yesterday despite their actions today. That's the mistake of the GOP. They are assuming Bush stands for the same party as Lincoln. Consistency, by my belief, is being consistent in your support of ideals and progress, not support of people of a certain label. I can't vote for someone who puts their party above the populace they should represent. If Kucinich were my rep, I'd vote for him. Not because of his party. Not even because he has a curiously hot wife (I'm guessing hypnosis). I'd vote for him because I feel he'd represent me and my community. That's the name of the game.
Willravel is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360