|
instead of a vote for 'none of the above,' i'd rather be able to vote against a candidate. actively take one vote away from them. that way, my vote in somewhere in the SE might have a chance of actually mattering. i think for many people who view voting as a chance to pick the candidate they feel is the least dangerous, it's a clearer depiction of a voter's intent.
pan: i don't know what to say about your view of the democratic party. i honestly didn't read everything above, but i think i am familiar with your position. you're a populist - i don't think our government really caters to such these days. see the oligarchy bit.
i think you'd have to have a michael mcdonald 'takin it to the streets' type political montage moment to have your views represented. personally, i think you're better off being active at the local level, where you might find some causes worthy of engagement.
filthy: hell yes mitt - all the way.
__________________
You don't love me, you just love my piggy style
|