Quote:
|
Originally Posted by host
If you've wasted the last six years believing the official 9/11 attacks story, and if you've "bought" the "line" about the legitimacy of the "War on Terr-urr", hook, line, and sinker.....can you explain to me why the "decider" looks like an obvious liar about the key reasons for his breaking the FISA laws....and why he risks making the war on terror seem as big of a farce as his radio "address to the nation" was today?
|
I did not find how the "decider" looks like an obvious lier about the key reasons for his breaking the FISA laws.
What were his reasons and how are those reasons lies?
Who concluded that he actually broke the law?
Why was no action taken against him on his illegal directives?