(the title of the article, NOT my title)
I was reading around today and came across this (I really wasn't sure which forum to put this in, so feel free to move if need be).
Quote:
Appalling news from the West Coast: The latest strain of the disease, uber-liberalism, has crept its way up the California coast and into Seattle, Washington. Men’s skirts, it would seem, is what the fashionable-fairies from San Francisco to Seattle are wearing this season. They are no longer content to swish and prance about in shorty-shorts or repulsively tight slacks anymore, so they have began wearing women’s clothing.
The kilt, long associated with those ghastly Scots, has seen a drastic increase in popularity among the jet-setting homosexual crowd. One manufacturer of this perfectly obscene item, Utilikilts in Seattle, was recently interviewed and subsequently featured prominently on the front page of Yahoo News. (See links below)
Friends, we are living in a world where nothing is sacred and very little is left to the imagination. The very last thing we need in this country is for homosexuals to be permitted, by law mind you, to wear a skirt. It is understood, that while the sodomite would unnaturally embrace the feminine attributes of a man-skirt or kilt, the main purpose is that it grants them easy and quick access for fornicating.
Something must be done to stop this horrendous fashion-do not from making its way into your Christian neighborhood. Immediately I might add for the children must be protected from ever seeing such a thing. I suggest contacting your Senator immediately and inquiring about any laws regarding indecent exposure, which might apply tom this disgusting fad.
No real man, not a heterosexual one with a shred of self-respect, Scottish or not, would permit himself to be caught dead in a skirt, unless he was playing the bagpipe while in Scotland, at a historically-themed wedding. Even then I find his heterosexuality suspect at best.
|
http://baptistsforbrown2008.wordpres...on-of-seattle/
This was my response, so I reckon it's good enough to post here as well:
Quote:
Attitudes like this actually make me embarrassed to call myself a Christian and be lumped in with people like this. As a genealogist and someone that researches other cultures and their way of life AND as the wife of a MAN that is a kilt wearer I’m as offended for the Scots as I am anyone else.
I wish I lived where this person was running just so I could have the pleasure of voting against such a bigoted, unchristian person. Get a clue, gays are not the only people that wear kilts.
This literally makes me sick to my stomach, its people like you that cause such hatred towards GOOD Christians.
|
I am simply taken aback that these people are spewing this garbage and spouting such hate against a nation of people that helped in the fight as patriots for american freedom.
Women's clothing? Since when is a kilt womens clothing? Are they implying that just because a gay man might wear one that all of the sudden it is? Women do not wear kilts!!! The definition of "kilt" says its a MAN's form of dress, not a womens, so how can they be considered cross dressing?
Ugh.....as I said previously this simply makes me embarrassed to be in any way associated with religion.
You dont ever see a depiction of Jesus in pants, did that make him "gay" too? Did the people of the time wear those long "gowns" for lack of better word cause I dont know what they were called, just so they could have a quickie on the road?