Originally Posted by dksuddeth

It isn't any different than trying to 'lead a horse to water'. If they aren't willing to drink what is plainly in front of them, who am I to force it on them?

I back it up with the plain text of the constitution, what more do you want?


The USSC is completely capable of interpreting the constitution. What people conveniently bury their heads in the sand about is that there are two political agendas in this country when it concerns the judiciary power and neither of them have the constitution in mind. Again, the plain reading of the text of the constitution is very easy to understand. It's when you get people with an agenda that does not jive with the plain text of the constitution is where you end up with tortured definitions of words like 'is'.