|
dksuddeth, "if you don't agree with me you are dumb" isn't a very compelling argument.
It might be acceptable if you could ever be bothered to back up the claims you make with anything beyond, "if you don't agree with me you are dumb," but that seems to be a rarity.
Really, i'm genuinely interested in the point you're trying to make, it's just difficult really relate to it when you refuse to back it up in any sort of meaningful way.
If the ussc isn't capable of interpreting the constitution, what makes you think that you are?
|