Thread: WAR
View Single Post
Old 07-18-2007, 10:12 AM   #114 (permalink)
sapiens
Junkie
 
sapiens's Avatar
 
Location: Some place windy
Quote:
Originally Posted by roachboy
problem with these claims is that they are all abstract--they are not theories of subjective dispositions--they do not tell you what this "greed" tendency might be, what it might mean for any particular individual, what associations come to be bundled around it, what triggers it, what desires are associated with it, what actions might follow. none of it. the category is not predictive.
I agree with your statements above as they apply to how "human nature" is used in the posts above. Simply attributing something to "human nature" doesn't help us understand the problem - war. It's just a label (much like "socialization" or "society" or "politics" as an explanation for something). As you said, the way "human nature" is used above is not predictive. I do think that it is possible to have a theory of human nature that is predictive. Evolutionary biologists, etc. use evolutionary theories to make testable predictions about human psychology.

I don't think that "human nature" and social forces are mutually exclusive. A coherent theory of human behavior or "human nature" needs to account for the interaction of evolved dispositions with environmental conditions. So, both are necessary to explain human behavior. An aside: I don't think that a preference for stasis and avoidance of pain are all that is "human nature". I don't understand the basis for such a claim.
Quote:
if you want to talk about controlling people: what could be more controlling than erasing space for responsibility for one's own actions by crushing their motives back into some eternal grid or some hydraulic system that animates them but over which they have no influence (except via some god who knows the deal and tells you what to do thank you sir may i have another?)
Social explanations can be equally controlling - Skinnerian explanations of human behavior, cycle of violence explanations of human behavior, the twinkie defense, etc. all attribute human behavior to either social or environment forces independent of the individual.

Last edited by sapiens; 07-18-2007 at 10:14 AM..
sapiens is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360