|
You seem to miss the point.
Given the total amount of accurate sceintific data available on a subject. someone has to decide what gets published on a website and what gets removed. If you don't like what I want to have posted, what makes you more correct than me assuming the data I want to post is scientifically correct?
If there are two effective methods for combating a disease and I want to promote one of those methods over the other, given scientific proof that my method can be as effective or more effective than the other, how does that suggest an inappropriate use of scientific data?
Specifically referring to the example about condom use vs. abstinence - how has the promotion of condom use suffered under the Bush administration? It seems to me that I hear more about condom use today than during any other time of my life.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on lunch."
"It is useless for the sheep to pass resolutions on vegetarianism while the wolf is of a different opinion."
"If you live among wolves you have to act like one."
"A lady screams at the mouse but smiles at the wolf. A gentleman is a wolf who sends flowers."
|